It’s Getting Better All the Time

It’s Getting Better All the Time

I frequently hear people say that they think the world is getting more evil and more dangerous. But the statistics show that, in most ways, over the last few decades life has been getting better for most people, and violence and crime are decreasing in meaningful ways for most people.

Let’s talk about some of the many ways in which the world is getting better. Let’s start with the most evil things in many religions: murder and abortion:

Murder, violence, and death

The murder rate in the United States has gone down from 10.2 per 100,000 in 1980 to 5.0 in 2009 – a greater than fifty percent decrease.1

Many people don’t really understand the scale of death and horror which occurred in the first half of the twentieth century. It was truly the bloodiest, most deadly period in all of human history. Things have significantly improved since then. During World War I2 and its aftermath, 9 million combatants died, 5 to 10 million Russians died in the famine of 1921, about one million Armenians were killed in Turkey, and the 1918 flu pandemic (which spread mostly because of the wartime conditions) killed at least 50 million people. Between 11 and 17 million people3 died in the holocaust (six million Jews, plus gypsies, POW’s, Jehovah’s Witnesses, other political prisoners); during World War II,4 a total of between fifty and seventy million people died as a result of the war (about 20 million soldiers and about 40 million civilians) – one of out every four citizens of the USSR was wounded or killed.

The number of people killed during Stalin’s rule in the USSR has been estimated at between 3.5 to 50 million people.5 The number of people killed under Mao’s rule in China has been estimated at between 19.5 and 77 million. The number of people who died under communist regimes has been estimated at between 94 and 144.7 million.

So, let’s add up these numbers from WWI, WWII, and from communism gives us a range of between 220 million and 284 million (the numbers of people who died from the 1918 flu account for 50 million of each of these numbers, since the principal cause of the pandemic was WWI, I think it appropriate to include them as being a result of the violence and murder of the war). These numbers are so big that it can be easy to gloss over them. To emphasize: 284,000,000 individuals and their potential descendants, each with families, hopes, and aspirations are gone forever. The numbers I cite are for the years from 1914 to 1976, which would be a yearly death rate of between 3.5 and 4.6 million people (there was significant variation in the rate – the yearly rate trended down after WWI and would have been much lower in the 1970s than during WWI or WWII). How does that compare with now? In 2004 the worldwide number of people killed in armed conflicts was 250,000, and the number killed by intentional homicide was 490,000, for a total of 740,000 killed as a result of violence.6 Doesn’t the huge decrease in murder mean that on the whole, the world is much less evil than it used to be? Doesn’t this mean that goodness, and not evil, has increased in the world over the last thirty to fifty years?

Worldwide, the risk of dying in armed conflict is 0.8 per 100,000 population – if you only count countries in conflict, the risk is 2 per 100,000.7 I don’t have the numbers for the first half of the 20th century, but I am sure that this number was much higher then. The number of direct conflict deaths from intrastate conflict decreased by almost one-third from 31,607 in 2004 to 23,517 in 2007. In 68 countries examined, homicide rates decreased in 33 of them and stayed flat in 17 of them between 1998 and 2006 – that is a total of 50 countries where homicide rates decreased or stayed flat. In only 11 countries was there an increasing trend in homicide rates.

Abortion and Sex

The rate of abortion peaked in about 1981, and has been steadily falling ever since.8 Most people, whether they are pro-choice or pro-life, believe that abortion is not a good thing. Most people who are pro-choice generally believe that even though abortion is often a difficult thing, each woman should have the right to evaluate her circumstances and decide for herself whether to get an abortion. Since abortion is still legal and available in the United States, if abortions are going down, then it is because more women are choosing not to get one. This fact is something that both the pro-choice and pro-life crowds can agree is a good thing. Many people who are pro-life are motivated by a religious conviction that abortion is evil; from that perspective, then the last thirty years have brought a significant decrease in evil and increase in goodness

How about sex? I hear people in church talk all the time about the sexual immorality running rampant in the United States. In 2009, teen birth rates hit the lowest rate they’ve ever been since the government started measuring statistics in 1940.9 The teen birth rate is lower now than it has even been in the last 70 years (and it is not because teens are getting more abortions, since abortion rates are down too). Teen pregnancy rates (which can be different than teen birth rates because of abortions) have also been decreasing10 (there was a 28% decrease11 from 1990 to 2000).

The percentage of teenage boys, aged 15-17, who claim to be virgins has increased from 50% in 1988 to 69% in 2002 (for girls it increased from 63% to 70% over the same time).12 Here is a good quote from Reason Magazine summarizing the trends in teen sexual behavior:

Despite all the lascivious music, sexual activity among teens has been on the decline. A federal survey found that in 1991, 54 percent of high school students reported they had had sexual intercourse. In 2005, the number was down to 47 percent. Oral sex is allegedly the rage among the pubescent set, but David Landry, a researcher at the Alan Guttmacher Institute, says its popularity has been stable.13

Not only are teenagers more cautious about having sex, they are more cautious while having sex: Condom use has risen by more than a third since the early 1990s. From 1990 through 2000, the pregnancy rate among adolescents fell every year, for a cumulative decline of 28 percent.

Now let’s look at violence. Teen violence in the United States is also down. Again, from Reason:

Teens today are considerably less likely to get in fights or carry weapons than they were 15 years ago. Kids under the age of 18 commit only one-third as many crimes as they did in the peak year of 1993.14

Violence

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, violent crime rates have been decreasing since the 1970s.15 The U.S. rate in 2009 was 16.9 crimes per 1,000 of population. The rate in 1973 was 47.7 – that means that the violent crime rate in 1973 was almost three times higher than it is now. By other measures, the violent crime rate peaked in 1991 and has been declining since then and is now at the same level as 1973; either way, there has been at least a two-decade decrease in crime rates.16

Living Conditions

And finally, living conditions. Despite the recession, living conditions have significantly improved for most people over the last few decades. Poverty rates (as measured by the percentage of people living on less than $1 a day) have been decreasing in all regions of the world for the last few decades.17 Other indicators of human development (such as literacy and life expectancy) have been getting better as well. For most parts of the world,18 the last decade has been the best ever.19

In the United States, things have also been getting better for the poor, especially when you account for the lower rate of inflation of goods purchased by low-income households.20 By most measures, the poor in the United States today enjoy a higher standard of living than the middle class did in 1971.21 People in the United States need to spend far less of their income on food, clothing, and shelter,22 and have a far greater percentage of their income available to spend on non-necessities than ever before.23 Americans have more leisure now, and spend less time working.24

Conclusion

So why do we hear people talking about how bad and dangerous the world has become? Warning people about the dangers and problems they face (even if they are not real) is a great rhetorical tool to get people to pay attention to you and follow your advice. It is also a natural human reaction to filter our memories and remember the past as the “good old days.” But as W. Michael Cox and Richard Alm said in 1995, the good old days are now. The truth is that there has never been a better time to be alive. We should be grateful every day for the amazing living conditions we enjoy. The world is a beautiful place, and it is getting better and better. Does this mean it will always improve? No. Does that mean that it can’t get worse? No. We should be vigilant in working to address the problems that still exist in our world. But we have so many more reasons to be optimistic and hopeful than to be negative or fearful about the state of the world and its future. We should all realize how many reasons we have to be happy, hopeful, and optimistic, instead of focusing on doom and gloom.

9 http://www.newsday.com/news/health/teen-birthrates-in-u-s-lowest-in-70-years-1.2578646 . Admittedly, the high numbers in the 1940s and 1950s were not because of unwed mothers, but because people got married younger. I would argue,though, that a teen pregnancy, even when the girl is married, is a bad thing.

21 thoughts on “It’s Getting Better All the Time

  1. Great details and stat back up. You do ignore one troubling trend, the increase of births out of marriage. The US continues to careen to a day when fewer than half of children are born to married couples. If we believe that marriage is an important plus for the raising of children, this suggests increasing troubles ahead.

    1. Mark — No matter how good things get, there is always room for improvement. I agree that the trend in out-of-wedlock births in the United States is not a good thing, and that it is something which we need to fix.

      It still doesn’t change, though, all of the good things we have going for us. I think it is important and beneficial for us to approach life with hope. Yes, there are lots of things that can get better — but we should approach those problems not with dread or a sense of foreboding about our future, but instead with happiness and gratitude for all of the good things that are happening, and with hope that the bad things can also get better.

      1. Marriage is a dying institution. In this country, both parents are financially responsible for any children they create.
        The “need” for marriage has essentially been done away with. I’ll go so far as to say that “marriage” doesn’t produce better children, better parenting produces better children.

        1. I disagree that marriage is a dying institution. It is still important. Married people are much more likely to stay together than cohabiting couples. Even if a cohabiting couple later gets married, they are still more likely to divorce than a married couple that never lived together before marriage. A child born to a cohabiting couple is thus much more likely to end up living in a single parent household or being raised by a step parent (after their single parent remarries or moves in with someone else). Children in single parent households are much more likely to have all sorts of negative outcomes. Similarly, children who are raised in a household with a stepparent suffer all sorts of negative effects.
          .

  2. There’s another factor: Today we can communicate an order of magnitude more rapidly and efficiently than at any other previous point in history.

    Even though there’s less crime and death, we HEAR about the existing crime and death more, because we have so many channels funneling the news into our eyes and ears.

    Even the traditional news media is more efficient at collecting and disseminating bad news. I’ve found my mood has improved somewhat since I stopped constantly watching the news and only catching up now and then. 🙂

  3. Excellently written. It’s nice to see I’m not the only one who feels that the world wouldn’t be nearly as bad as it is if people didn’t always tell us the world is so bad. It’s nice to have some statistical backup for it.

  4. I’d would have to say that I am only partially happy to be living during this time. Seeing as most of the real crap that is going on is completely ignored by the media and the masses, it’s a wonder that anyone can say that things are really better. This time may be a transition into something more gruesome and sinister, because there are a lot of things happening right now that we need to keep tabs on. The situation in the Middle East and now Africa is not exactly new to human society, but it’s getting increasingly more unstable.

    If you deny the existence of a global elite then you are in for a terrible surprise. They have already decided to sacrifice most of mankind to fulfill their own agenda. As soon as you start spreading this “all is good” stuff then people will be falsely persuaded into apathy, even more than we see today.

    To dismiss the evil things that are going on in the world would be to give up everything you have, including your life, for the sake of the globalists would be a mistake. As logical beings, we have to understand that while things get good things also get bad. It’s a never-ending cycle that makes up the chaos and order, yin and yang.

    I think that statistics tell only part of the story. Naturally, there is no reason to believe everything that comes out of a group of fanatic statistic lovers. There are so many manipulated statistics out there that I just can no longer believe most of them. The government has been using their flawed unemployment calculations and have been feeding to the public via the mass media.

    WAKE UP AMERICA!

  5. Good article. I agree with most of what you say but I have to add one important caveat. While living standards for human beings have never been better, the health of the rest of the natural world has never been worse. Today, species biodiversity is declining faster than at any rate in human history, global warming is on the rise and a global mass extinction termed the Halocene extinction is currently underway. There is no good reason human beings and nature can’t coexist but if people don’t become more cognizant of the other 99.99999999% of species we share this planet with, I fear for the future. So yes, while human welfare has never been better, the hard work of improving the welfare of the rest of planet earth is a monumental task that has yet to be addressed in any meaningful way.

  6. Great article…well documented bibliography…how often do you see that in today’s opinionated world. One thing I don’t think correlated well was the sexual immorality point that was trying to be made. Sexual morality deals with the decision to have sex and with whom and what kind of weight one puts on that personal decision. Birth rates being lowered speaks to medical advancements and widespread availability of the pill. Not that morality has improved, simply that the outcome of that morality can be manipulated and controlled somewhat. Morality and getting pregnant are two separate subjects a that did not seam together well. Keep in mind, that is the only thing I questioned in the article. Good Job.

    1. I agree that there is still room for improvement on sexual issues. Like I said above, the rate of out-of-wedlock births in the United States is not good. But some of the statistics I cited are not just about birthrates. The percentage of 15-17 year old boys, who claim to be virgins increased from 50% in 1988 to 69% in 2002 — that is pretty good news, I think.

  7. James,

    Very well written and backed up with verifiable resources. I would like to draw your attention to a few things and let you cogitate on them, and hear your comments:

    1. Go examine the western world history between 1865-1914. The rate of improvement was stupendous. Almost all of the statistics you cite, you can find parallels (granted you have to extrapolate quite a bit because we didn’t have the same level of record keeping as today) for that time period.

    2. One of the leading reasons for that was because of the dawn of Hydrocarbon man. As long as we have plentiful carbon fuels I think that things will be OK. Yes, I know that WWI was started because an Arch-Duke was assassinated, but that was simply the pretext for the aggression that occurred. And I think it is very defensible to state that WWII was simply a continuation of WWI. Control of Oil across the globe was the driving reason behind most of the geopolitical positioning and fighting. It wasn’t stated publicly, but looking back at the historical record (especially the memoirs of some of the participants) leads me to believe that WWI & WWII were primarily resource wars at their most fundamental level.

    If you accept that (and if you don’t, I would like to hear the contrary opinion) then the next question that needs to be asked is what happens when you have world that for all intents and purposes is improving, but that the improvement is primarily fueled (no pun intended) by declining fossil fuels? I agree that since the end of WWII the world (again primarily the western world until the late 80’s/early 90’s) has seen miraculous improvement, but I think that the improvement has come because of plentiful fossil fuels where the production of them was regulated (first by the Texas RailRoad Commission, then by OPEC).

    Only now, in the face of insatiable demand, we can’t rise up to meet the request for that sweet light crude. The only reason demand has gone down slightly the last two years is because of the demand destruction that occurred within the context of the 2008 Financial Crisis. Even with the demand destruction that occurred in the western world, we still have China building ghost cities and trying to move their coastal citizens to a western style consumption economy (I am pretty sure the typical subsistence interior HAN Chinese farmer isn’t part of that equation).

    Yes, we have Natural gas fields open to us because of fracking and horizontal drilling(but check out their decline rates-very scary indeed!

    Yes, we have Oil Shale (but check out the economics of it, and also look into the Energy Returned over the Energy Invested or Net Energy if you prefer, and dont forget to look into the water reqs for it. Simply incredible!)

    Yes, we have oil in the oceans of Brazil (and off the American Gulf coast), but look at the technical challenges of bringing the oil up from the depths that we are going for it. And the amount that we need to replace.

    My point is that in order for the improvement to continue, we must increase our consumption of oil. The only problem is all of the good oil has been used over the last 150 years. We are now scraping the barrel for the dregs. Maybe we find a few more barrels. But at the rate we are consuming versus the rate we are discovering, it doesn’t look like the improvement will continue.

    And lets just ignore the fact that the US is adding debt to the tune of $125Billion/Month (and that is just the official Fed gov’t debt, never mind corporations levering up again, States that can’t pay pension obligations, etc).

    I agree that those of us that have lived post WWII have lived in the most incredible of times and yes even up to today, these are the good old days. But in my opinion, a simple analysis projecting current trends into the future tells me that sometime in the next decade, we get to start the process of deconstructing this incredibly complex interconnected system that we call the World Economy simply because we won’t be able to power it like we are accustomed to.

    I do hope I am wrong!

    Paul

    P.S. for detailed stats I would recommend going to ChrisMartenson.com and viewing his online course, Read Dan Yergins The Prize (history of Oil), check out the info at the Oildrum.com and Gail the actuary at http://ourfiniteworld.com/ as well as listen to the Financial Sense Newshour online for starters

    1. I don’t see any reason to believe that good substitutes won’t be available by the time we run out of hydrocarbons. Even if we reach peek oil soon (and it seems that the projections for when that will happen keep on getting moved later and later), there are other substitutes we can use until other sources of energy are tapped (for example natural gas reserves are much higher than oil reserves, and it is not too hard to convert existing cars to run on natural gas); nuclear energy for electricity, etc., etc.

      1. James,

        I hope you are right. I would recommend to you to read Jeff Brown’s Export Land Model. As a former oil field worker (actually chemical industry in Texas, but 95% of our product supported Oil Field operations in West Texas), I can tell you that the concept of Peak Oil (as defined by declining flow rates NOT TOTAL AMOUNT OF OIL!!) has already happened. I agree with you that serial doomsday prophets are annoying and irrelevant. I don’t think you can put Robert Hirsch, Jim Puplava, Matt Simmons (deceased), and many others in that category.

        When Boone Pickens walks away from Oil to make money in alternative fuels (OK CNG is a hydrocarbon, but molecularly speaking there is a reason we use Gas instead of CNG, historically) then that is a signpost of change. When the US embassy cables DC and tells them that there is compelling evidence that the Saudis can’t go above 10 MBD and that the rate will be declining, it vindicates Matt Simmons. See his boo, “Twilight in the Desert”.

        Take a look at flow rates from the Bakken Shale Play in North Texas, we are already seeing significant output decline rates that were supposed to happen 30 years out, happen in less than 10.

        I wish that I could be more optimistic that we will have good substitutes when we run out of the really good (IE cheap and powerful) hydrocarbons, but my personal experience in the field, my research of the facts from multiple data points, leads me to believe that is not the case.

        I really do hope I am wrong.

        Good luck!

        Paul

  8. You’re incorrect about the costs for shelter as a percentage of income for most people, but in any case your time frame of reference corresponds to a phenomenal increase in personal and state debt.

  9. Thank you. This article made me think. Many things are indeed getting better. Then why do so many people feel so bad?

    * The steep rise in fatherlessness is tragic and huge. And James, you are right that it is not a good thing. Outcomes are much worse in such households on average for the children.

    Other major negatives:

    * Depletion of many natural resources that have been a big part of prosperity. This is only now starting to be felt but may be felt for many years into the future.

    * National and generational debt loads that are looking to result in the first generation in many years where standards of living actually decline.

    * Decreases in crime are connected in part to the highest incarceration rates in world history in America

    * Skyrocketing rates of depression among young people
    http://media.www.thetriangle.org/media/storage/paper689/news/2008/01/11/News/Student.Depression.Rates.Rising-3149759.shtml

    * An apparent flattening of life expectancy in the developed world

    * Greatly diminished optimism in the future. A big part of happiness is not merely present good conditions but a sense that the future will be better than the present. This optimistic feeling may be lower than ever.
    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/right_direction_or_wrong_track

    * Intractible gaps between haves and have-nots in a globalized economy. As the world gets more complex, this effect grows.

    * Diminishing sense of self-determination in a world where more and more moves into the realm of what one cannot personally control. Job satisfaction is closely related to the amount of personal control one has. Similarly in life, one can expect loss of personal control to adversely affect happiness.

    1. Dan —

      I disagree with many of the problems you mention:

      Natural resources: environmentalists have been predicting imminent collapse for decades. They have consistently been wrong. Read this: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Ehrlich-Simon_bet . I think economic forces will ensure that this will not be a problem (and good government policy can also help).

      Declining standards of living: I have seen no evidence for this. Do you have any numbers to back it up? A book I’d suggest on this topic is called Myths Of Rich And Poor by Michael W. Cox and Richard Alm (published in 1999, but the numbers haven’t changed things in the last 10 years that I have seen), which pretty conclusively shows how much better standards of living have become in the United States since the 1970s.

      Decreased optimism in the world: This post should help people realize that there are so many reasons to be optimistic and have hope!

      Life expectancy: there are certain biological limits to how high it can get. Flattening rates could mean that we are reaching those limits. In any case, there are lots of new cutting-edge discoveries in the life sciences which could reverse that trend.

  10. Women’s reproductive rights have been under attack since Roe vs. Wade. That may account more for the decline in abortions. The recent Hyde amendment shinnanagans is only the most recent of these attacks.

    I had to admit, though, that when the Egyptians have yet to be carpet bombed, the world was getting better, despite the continued polluting, erosion of labor rights, and concentration of wealth at the top. The lack of carpet bombing is a grim acknowledgment of your point, but you still sound like Dr. Pangloss.

    1. Dr. Pangfloss? I don’t think so!

      I didn’t say we live in the best of all possible worlds, or that there isn’t lots of room for improvement — just that, in most ways, the world has been getting better in concrete and measurable ways.

      About abortion: about half the country would disagree with you on whether it is good or bad for abortion rights to be limited. I don’t want to get into an abortion debate. I think the numbers speak for themselves: abortion is still legal and available in all states, and the rate of abortion has gone down. Can’t both sides agree that this is good? Do you think it would be better if the abortion numbers go up?

  11. Hi,

    I really liked your article. My family constantly talks about how these are the worst times and how everything is going to hell. I often thought about how we used to burn witches and how I have never even seen a person killed in front of me even though there are hundreds of stories on the news about it.

    Your article helped me confirm my views.

    Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *